Endgame WWII – The key questions: Why was crossing the Rhine so easy?

In the second part of our series marking the 80th anniversary of the last months of World War II, Taylor Downing asks why crossing the Rhine in March 1945 was not the great obstacle that Allied commanders feared.

The Rhine has been a great barrier through history. The mighty river became the eastern border of the Roman empire, and no emperor after Caesar tried to permanently conquer the lands beyond it. It was the boundary between Roman ‘civilisation’ and the ‘barbarians’. In countless wars since, it has been an obstacle that only the most successful generals have been able to cross in anger – such as Marshal Blücher, who built an early pontoon-style bridge in 1813 and succeeded in carrying the war against Napoleon into France itself.

And so, at the beginning of 1945, Supreme Commander General Dwight D Eisenhower was naturally daunted by the prospect of having to cross the Rhine. He wrote of it as a ‘formidable military obstacle’. It was wide, deeply embanked and fast-flowing with wild currents. He described trying to cross it as more like ‘assaulting a beach’ than traversing a river. General George C Marshall, the Chief of Staff in Washington, later wrote: ‘I dreaded… the advance to the Rhine more than any other operation during the war.’

US Army troops cross the Ludendorff railway bridge at Remagen, following the discovery that its German defenders had failed to destroy this key Rhine crossing.

Formidable strength

To the Germans, the Rhine was a vital line of resistance, a border in the German national psyche that had to be defended to save the Fatherland. And, of course, the Allies knew that the Germans had explosives planted on most of the bridges across the Rhine, which they would blow up in advance of the arrival of Allied troops.

Features Turning point: The road to Appomattox – Part 2: 1863
Features Seizing the crown